Selectivity Differences in Cogent TYPE-C Stationary Phases - Tech Information
February 15, 2015
/
/
/
/
Date: 15-FEBRUARY-2015   Last Updated: 10-FEBRUARY-2026

Using Different Cogent TYPE‑C™ HPLC Stationary Phases for Selectivity Control – Tech Information

Selecting the right stationary phase is one of the most powerful tools in chromatographic method development. Cogent™ TYPE‑C™ HPLC columns provide several unique bonded‑phase chemistries, each engineered to offer distinct selectivity profiles that help analysts optimize resolution, retention, and peak shape across a broad spectrum of analytes. 

1. Why Selectivity Matters in Method Development

Different analytes interact with stationary phases through hydrophobic, polar, steric, and secondary interactions. Even subtle changes in stationary‑phase chemistry can dramatically alter resolution. Cogent TYPE‑C™ columns use silica‑hydride particles, enabling consistent surface chemistry and highly predictable selectivity across RP, ANP, and NP modes.

2. Selectivity Differences Between TYPE‑C™ Ligands

Each Cogent bonded ligand provides its own retention profile, allowing users to tune chromatographic behavior without altering mobile‑phase components. For example:

  • Cogent Bidentate C18™: A more hydrophobic phase with stronger overall retention.
  • Cogent UDC‑Cholesterol™: Exhibits sharper selectivity differences for challenging separations, especially aromatic compounds.

Under identical chromatographic conditions, these two phases can resolve analytes very differently. In a demonstrated comparison, UDC‑Cholesterol™ produced a separation factor (α) of 2.30 between anthracene and tert‑butylbenzene, versus 1.58 on the Bidentate C18™ — a significant gain in selectivity that directly improves resolution. 

3. Advantages Across Multiple Retention Modes

These selectivity patterns are not limited to reversed‑phase. Because TYPE‑C™ columns can operate in Aqueous Normal Phase (ANP), standard Normal Phase (NP), and RP, method developers can exploit ligand‑specific selectivity across multiple modes using a single family of stationary phases.

4. Practical Benefits in Real‑World Method Development

  • Faster optimization: Swap ligand chemistry instead of rebuilding gradient systems.
  • Better resolution of structurally similar analytes: Especially aromatics, isomers, and partially hydrophobic species.
  • Predictable behavior: Silica‑hydride surfaces minimize silanol interference, promoting consistent peak shapes and retention.
  • Versatility: One phase family supports three chromatographic modes using the same column type.

Whether you’re troubleshooting a difficult method or developing a new separation from scratch, leveraging TYPE‑C™ selectivity differences can dramatically shorten development time and improve analytical outcomes. 


📌Summary

Cogent TYPE‑C™ stationary phases provide unique selectivity profiles determined by their bonded ligands. Phases such as Bidentate C18™ and UDC‑Cholesterol™ can exhibit dramatically different retention behaviors under the same conditions, enabling analysts to fine‑tune separation selectivity without changing mobile phases.

For example, UDC‑Cholesterol™ has shown superior selectivity between certain aromatic analytes, yielding higher separation factors and better resolution. Because TYPE‑C™ columns also support RP, ANP, and NP modes, selectivity advantages extend across multiple separation strategies, making these columns powerful tools for advanced method development
.

Related Articles

  1. Acetone as The Organic Mobile Phase Component - AppNote
  2. Differences Between HILIC Columns and ANP Columns - Tech Information
  3. Selectivity Modification in an ANP Method Using Different Mobile Phase pH - Tips & Suggestions

© Copyright 2026. MICROSOLV. All Rights Reserved. Website & Hosting by BlueTone Media